[PATCH] ISC DHCP, feature, add support for IPSEC interface, request for comment. [ISC-Bugs #43221]

Thomas Markwalder tmark at isc.org
Mon Dec 5 12:16:29 UTC 2016


On 12/4/16 4:16 PM, PiBa-NL wrote:
> bump?
>
> Op 16-10-2016 om 19:46 schreef PiBa-NL:
>>
>> bump? anyone?
>>
>> -------- Doorgestuurd bericht --------
>> Onderwerp: 	Fwd: [PATCH] ISC DHCP, feature, add support for IPSEC
>> interface, request for comment. [ISC-Bugs #43221]
>> Datum: 	Tue, 4 Oct 2016 01:16:54 +0200
>> Van: 	PiBa-NL <PiBa.NL.dev at gmail.com>
>> Aan: 	dhcp-users-request at lists.isc.org
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello isc dhcp-users,
>>
>> I would like to request what is the proper way to submit a new
>> feature (support for enc0 ipsec interface) for ISC DHCP ?
>>
>> I've send below mail/attachment to both dhcp-workers and dhcp-suggest
>> but have not yet received a reply. Is there anything else i should
>> do? Or what should i expect will happen in what approximate
>> time-frame if any can be estimated?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> PiBa-NL
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Doorgestuurd bericht --------
>> Onderwerp: 	[PATCH] ISC DHCP, feature, add support for IPSEC
>> interface, request for comment. [ISC-Bugs #43221]
>> Datum: 	Fri, 23 Sep 2016 20:11:27 +0200
>> Van: 	PiBa-NL <PiBa.NL.dev at gmail.com>
>> Aan: 	dhcp-workers at lists.isc.org
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi ISC / Developers,
>>
>> I hope i'm addressing the correct mail-address/list here.. Please do
>>
>> tell if i should send it elsewhere.
>>
>> I've added support on FreeBSD to allow for sending an DHCP-ACK message
>> over a 'enc0' interface in response to a DHCPINFORM request which is
>> used for ipsec connections.
>>
>> Windows7/10 requires that subnets to be routed over the vpn connection
>> will be send by a dhcp option 249 as described here:
>> https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/Windows7#Split-routing-on-Windows-10-and-Windows-10-Mobile
>>
>> I've only tested it between Windows10 and FreeBSD11rc2 sofar. But would
>> like to hear your opinion about this feature, is it possible to get it
>> merged in the next ISC-DHCP version? Or are there significant objections
>> against it?
>>
>> Also is the implementation as done alright or what should be changed in
>> my implementation? Any advice / requirements / changes i should do,
>> please let me know.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> PiBa-NL
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-workers mailing list
> dhcp-workers at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-workers

Hello:

We apologize for not getting back with you before now.  Your suggestion
ticket 43221 has been added to the list for evaluation for possible
inclusuion in our next release, 4.4.0.  There is not yet a firm date for
the release other than it will be sometime in 2017.  

We will update that ticket with our findings, which in turn will
generate an email to you.  Please be patient, ISC is a small non-profit
organization (contributions always welcomed) and our resources are finite.

We very much appreciate your interest in our software and thank you for
taking the time to submit your patch. 


Sincerely,

Thomas Markwalder

ISC Software Engineering



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-workers/attachments/20161205/f0119ee4/attachment.html>


More information about the dhcp-workers mailing list