[PATCH] ISC DHCP, feature, add support for IPSEC interface, request for comment. [ISC-Bugs #43221]

PiBa-NL piba.nl.dev at gmail.com
Sun Dec 4 21:16:58 UTC 2016


bump?

Op 16-10-2016 om 19:46 schreef PiBa-NL:
>
> bump? anyone?
>
> -------- Doorgestuurd bericht --------
> Onderwerp: 	Fwd: [PATCH] ISC DHCP, feature, add support for IPSEC 
> interface, request for comment. [ISC-Bugs #43221]
> Datum: 	Tue, 4 Oct 2016 01:16:54 +0200
> Van: 	PiBa-NL <PiBa.NL.dev at gmail.com>
> Aan: 	dhcp-users-request at lists.isc.org
>
>
>
> Hello isc dhcp-users,
>
> I would like to request what is the proper way to submit a new feature 
> (support for enc0 ipsec interface) for ISC DHCP ?
>
> I've send below mail/attachment to both dhcp-workers and dhcp-suggest 
> but have not yet received a reply. Is there anything else i should do? 
> Or what should i expect will happen in what approximate time-frame if 
> any can be estimated?
>
> Regards,
>
> PiBa-NL
>
>
>
> -------- Doorgestuurd bericht --------
> Onderwerp: 	[PATCH] ISC DHCP, feature, add support for IPSEC 
> interface, request for comment. [ISC-Bugs #43221]
> Datum: 	Fri, 23 Sep 2016 20:11:27 +0200
> Van: 	PiBa-NL <PiBa.NL.dev at gmail.com>
> Aan: 	dhcp-workers at lists.isc.org
>
>
>
> Hi ISC / Developers,
>
> I hope i'm addressing the correct mail-address/list here.. Please do
>
> tell if i should send it elsewhere.
>
> I've added support on FreeBSD to allow for sending an DHCP-ACK message
> over a 'enc0' interface in response to a DHCPINFORM request which is
> used for ipsec connections.
>
> Windows7/10 requires that subnets to be routed over the vpn connection
> will be send by a dhcp option 249 as described here:
> https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/Windows7#Split-routing-on-Windows-10-and-Windows-10-Mobile
>
> I've only tested it between Windows10 and FreeBSD11rc2 sofar. But would
> like to hear your opinion about this feature, is it possible to get it
> merged in the next ISC-DHCP version? Or are there significant objections
> against it?
>
> Also is the implementation as done alright or what should be changed in
> my implementation? Any advice / requirements / changes i should do,
> please let me know.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
>
> PiBa-NL
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-workers/attachments/20161204/ef5f35be/attachment.html>


More information about the dhcp-workers mailing list