IEPG outreach [was Re: Slides, agenda.]

[manning bill]

sorry - I guess I was reading a bit more into this.    if its posted via IETF, meets during IETF,  why is it NOT ietf?


> While I realize that IEPG is not technically part of IETF, is there any
> reason why we couldn't get a published agenda that is reachable via the
> IETF agenda pages so that folks who see it on the schedule can click to
> see what IEPG is and what it is doing?


/bill
PO Box 12317
Marina del Rey, CA 90295
310.322.8102

On 9November2014Sunday, at 16:13, George Michaelson <ggm at apnic.net> wrote:

> please do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
> 
> On 9 November 2014 14:07, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
> > would it be worthwhile to publish a history of IEPG and why or why not
> > it should be folded into IETF?  (it could just as easily be argued to
> > fold it into APRICOT or NANOG)
> 
> i think you are the only one suggesting folding it into anything
> 
> randy
> _______________________________________________
> Iepg mailing list
> Iepg at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
>