IEPG outreach [was Re: Slides, agenda.]

[Chris Morrow]

On 11/09/2014 07:54 PM, manning bill wrote:
> sorry - I guess I was reading a bit more into this.    if its posted
> via IETF, meets during IETF,  why is it NOT ietf?

and your larger point was: "And this is why it has classically not been
folded into the IETF: 'blah' ... Does this still apply?"

>> While I realize that IEPG is not technically part of IETF, is there
>> any reason why we couldn't get a published agenda that is reachable
>> via the IETF agenda pages so that folks who see it on the schedule
>> can click to see what IEPG is and what it is doing?
> 
> 
> /bill PO Box 12317 Marina del Rey, CA 90295 310.322.8102
> 
> On 9November2014Sunday, at 16:13, George Michaelson <ggm at apnic.net>
> wrote:
> 
>> please do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
>> 
>> On 9 November 2014 14:07, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>>> would it be worthwhile to publish a history of IEPG and why or
>>> why not it should be folded into IETF?  (it could just as easily
>>> be argued to fold it into APRICOT or NANOG)
>> 
>> i think you are the only one suggesting folding it into anything
>> 
>> randy _______________________________________________ Iepg mailing
>> list Iepg at lists.isc.org 
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ Iepg mailing list 
> Iepg at lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
>