IEPG outreach [was Re: Slides, agenda.]

[Brian E Carpenter]

On 10/11/2014 13:54, manning bill wrote:
> sorry - I guess I was reading a bit more into this.    if its posted via IETF, meets during IETF,  why is it NOT ietf?

Because it works better as an informal rule-free meeting?

Do you really want it to be subject to RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 (updated by RFC 4879)?
I think it works better with the only relevant BCP being #38 ;-)

(I'm all for making the agenda and slides easy to find, but that's
a separate issue.)

   Brian

> 
>> While I realize that IEPG is not technically part of IETF, is there any
>> reason why we couldn't get a published agenda that is reachable via the
>> IETF agenda pages so that folks who see it on the schedule can click to
>> see what IEPG is and what it is doing?
> 
> 
> /bill
> PO Box 12317
> Marina del Rey, CA 90295
> 310.322.8102
> 
> On 9November2014Sunday, at 16:13, George Michaelson <ggm at apnic.net> wrote:
> 
>> please do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
>>
>> On 9 November 2014 14:07, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>>> would it be worthwhile to publish a history of IEPG and why or why not
>>> it should be folded into IETF?  (it could just as easily be argued to
>>> fold it into APRICOT or NANOG)
>> i think you are the only one suggesting folding it into anything
>>
>> randy
>> _______________________________________________
>> Iepg mailing list
>> Iepg at lists.isc.org
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Iepg mailing list
> Iepg at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
> .
>