IEPG (Internet Engineering and Planning Group) meeting at IETF102 in Montreal.

[Warren Kumari]

Yup, we generally haven't been publishing an agenda, because, for along
time, we'd mainly been having last minute / pop-up type presentations.
We'd also been trying to keep the tone of this informal, but this is what
the agenda *currently* looks like:

Clusters of Re-Used Keys
Stephen Farrell
20 minutes

Indefensible Neighbors
Joel Jaeggli
20 minutes

Prefix hijacking - malicious? maybe not...
Joel Jaeggli
10 minutes

Dissecting DNS Defenses During DDoS Attacks
Giovane C. M. Moura
20 minutes

We are starting at 9:00AM this time.
W

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 8:35 PM Bernie Volz (volz) <volz at cisco.com> wrote:

> It is always sad that there is no agenda published for this. Or if there
> is, I’ve never found it.
>
> - Bernie
>
> On Jun 28, 2018, at 7:39 PM, Warren Kumari <warren at kumari.net> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We still have agenda time - please let myself and Chris Morrow
> ​ ​
> (<morrowc at ops-netman.net>) know if you'd like some time.
>
> W
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 9:36 AM Warren Kumari <warren at kumari.net> wrote:
>
>> The IEPG is an informal gathering that meets on the Sunday prior to IETF
>> meetings. The intended theme of these meetings is essentially one of
>> operational relevance in some form or fashion - although the chair will
>> readily admit that he will run with an agenda of whatever is on offer at
>> the time!
>>
>> Previous presentations are here: http://www.iepg.org/ .
>>
>> More info on the IEPG can be found in RFC 1690 -
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1690
>>
>> If you have some sort of operationally relevant topic which you'd
>> ​be willing​
>> ​ ​
>> to present, please let myself and Chris Morrow
>> ​ ​
>> (<morrowc at ops-netman.net>) know.
>>
>> W
>> ​
>> --
>> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea
>> in the first place.
>> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
>> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
>> pants.
>>    ---maf
>>
>
>
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea
> in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
> pants.
>    ---maf
>
>

-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
   ---maf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/iepg/attachments/20180704/827ea0ae/attachment.html>