high water mark wrong
Katsuhiro Kondou
kondou at nec.co.jp
Wed Aug 2 03:32:50 UTC 2000
In article <20000801172835R.bdale at col.hp.com>,
Bdale Garbee <bdale at col.hp.com> wrote;
} *Something* is wrong if the high water mark that results from a renumber
} is higher than the actual number of articles that are in the database for
} a group, right? Right now, the highest article in rec.video on this test
} server is 587, and 'ctlinnd renumber' changed the high water mark from 587 to
} 1920...
'ctlinnd renumber' probes overview and get hi/lo mark and
update if hi > current_hi or lo < current_lo. As to overview,
hi is updated if stored overview has larger article number
in Xref. The case means your server ever had such overview
data. As to active, I have no idea why it was not updated.
--
Katsuhiro Kondou
More information about the inn-bugs
mailing list