high water mark wrong

Katsuhiro Kondou kondou at nec.co.jp
Wed Aug 2 03:32:50 UTC 2000

In article <20000801172835R.bdale at col.hp.com>,
	Bdale Garbee <bdale at col.hp.com> wrote;

} *Something* is wrong if the high water mark that results from a renumber
} is higher than the actual number of articles that are in the database for 
} a group, right?  Right now, the highest article in rec.video on this test
} server is 587, and 'ctlinnd renumber' changed the high water mark from 587 to
} 1920...

'ctlinnd renumber' probes overview and get hi/lo mark and
update if hi > current_hi or lo < current_lo.  As to overview,
hi is updated if stored overview has larger article number
in Xref.  The case means your server ever had such overview
data.  As to active, I have no idea why it was not updated.
Katsuhiro Kondou

More information about the inn-bugs mailing list