sasl_config.c

[Russ Allbery]

Sven Paulus <sven at karlsruhe.org> writes:

> In INN-2.3 the prototype has two additional fields file and line. Why
> not using RENEW if it's there? Everywhere in the INN source RENEW is
> used instead of xrealloc. If you are doing some debugging work and need
> to replace the malloc()/free() functions it's easier if you only have to
> change one macro.

Right, sorry, I was talking only about the current tree.  BETA should use
the standard macros.

>> I've actually considered proposing the opposite (removing COPY from the
>> source tree in general and replacing it with xstrdup).  Likewise with

> But not in INN-2.3?!

Right, not in 2.3.

> I think INN should be consistent within one release.

Agreed.

> I was only talking about making INN-2.3 consistent, not about the
> current release.

Yup, sorry.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>