rra at stanford.edu
Tue Aug 15 19:34:43 UTC 2000
Sven Paulus <sven at karlsruhe.org> writes:
> In INN-2.3 the prototype has two additional fields file and line. Why
> not using RENEW if it's there? Everywhere in the INN source RENEW is
> used instead of xrealloc. If you are doing some debugging work and need
> to replace the malloc()/free() functions it's easier if you only have to
> change one macro.
Right, sorry, I was talking only about the current tree. BETA should use
the standard macros.
>> I've actually considered proposing the opposite (removing COPY from the
>> source tree in general and replacing it with xstrdup). Likewise with
> But not in INN-2.3?!
Right, not in 2.3.
> I think INN should be consistent within one release.
> I was only talking about making INN-2.3 consistent, not about the
> current release.
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the inn-bugs