ptomblin at xcski.com
Tue Sep 21 17:15:08 UTC 1999
Quoting Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu):
> Yeah, I agree that the current method isn't the best idea. My worry about
> using pathhost is that some people use all sorts of odd things for their
> path host and we could end up with message IDs that aren't fully
> qualified, which would be bad.
> Maybe tack domain onto the end of pathhost for message ID generation if it
> doesn't contain a .? Would that work?
Why not just leave it the way it is unless people specify something in
inn.conf? Either use the existing pathost or whatever, or add a new variable.
Paul Tomblin, not speaking for anybody.
SETI at Home: Finally a *good* way to impress Jodie Foster
More information about the inn-workers