Error in makehistory man page

Russ Allbery rra at stanford.edu
Sun Apr 30 00:29:46 UTC 2000


Katsuhiro Kondou <kondou at nec.co.jp> writes:

> The description of that part is correct, but I'd prefer to drop '-u'
> code, since the restriction written in makehistory(5) should be done by
> makehistory internally to avoid mistake.  I'll drop, if no one objects.

By "done internally," you mean to have makehistory always have the -u
behavior if there's an existing history file and have people remove the
existing history file if they really want a complete rebuild?  Or do you
mean something else?

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>



More information about the inn-workers mailing list