Wn changed, for the better?

[Russ Allbery]

TTSG <ttsg at ttsg.com> writes:

> To answer your question, yes, but YEEESSSH is it going to be nasty.
> Running "sm" for EVERY article that comes in? (And putting it in the
> perl hooks is not good, it slaughters the system and makes what we want
> to accomplish alot nastier)

Most folks who have needed to feed every incoming message through a
program haven't taken that many incoming messages.  :/  I agree that it's
a wart; it's one that hasn't been fixed yet to my satisfaction.  I can
think of a few ways that would improve it that I'll try to work on.

> What about a perl module into the Storage Manager?  Has that been
> devised yet? I didn't see any reference (QUICKLY LOOKING) at the system.

I think Greg has something at <http://members.xoom.com/meowing/cssri/>,
although I can't reach xoom.com at the moment to double-check.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>