Wn changed, for the better?

TTSG ttsg at ttsg.com
Wed Aug 23 22:16:38 UTC 2000


> 
> 
> TTSG <ttsg at ttsg.com> writes:
> 
> > To answer your question, yes, but YEEESSSH is it going to be nasty.
> > Running "sm" for EVERY article that comes in? (And putting it in the
> > perl hooks is not good, it slaughters the system and makes what we want
> > to accomplish alot nastier)
> 
> Most folks who have needed to feed every incoming message through a
> program haven't taken that many incoming messages.  :/  I agree that it's
> a wart; it's one that hasn't been fixed yet to my satisfaction.  I can
> think of a few ways that would improve it that I'll try to work on.
>
	And I'm open to suggestions for the same.
>
> > What about a perl module into the Storage Manager?  Has that been
> > devised yet? I didn't see any reference (QUICKLY LOOKING) at the system.
> 
> I think Greg has something at <http://members.xoom.com/meowing/cssri/>,
> although I can't reach xoom.com at the moment to double-check.
>
	It is there, but it says experimental only. Theres no email address
for me to mail him.

		Tuc/TTSG



More information about the inn-workers mailing list