inn2.3/inn2.2
Russ Allbery
rra at stanford.edu
Mon Jul 17 05:47:27 UTC 2000
OlivierS <teardrop at wanadoo.fr> writes:
> Does inn2.3 will allow to protect a newsgroup with a password and let
> the normal users which havent the password to read the others newgroups
> which arent protected ... ( it doesnt work with inn 2.2 )
I'm pretty sure this works in INN 2.2; it's certainly advertised to work
and I could have sworn that I'd heard confirmed reports of people who have
it working.
> foo.com:Read:::*
> foo.com:Post:::*,!local.foo
> To allow foo.com to read all the newsgroup but not to write on
> local.foo, I cant manage to do it with inn2.2 cause only the last line
> is considered by nnrpd ...
Sure, they're identical. What happens if you provide a username and
password?
*.foo.com:Read Post:username:password:*
*.foo.com:Read:::*,!local.foo
The first line should be ignored unless the client has authenticated
already.
Anyway, yes, this definitely does work in INN 2.3; you make sure the
authenticated connections get a different user string than the
unauthenticated connections and then write separate access groups matching
one or the other.
--
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list