Proposed death of verifycancels
Russ Allbery
rra at stanford.edu
Tue Jun 13 21:41:21 UTC 2000
Bill Davidsen <davidsen at tmr.com> writes:
> Turn that around... the existing code does not catch any valid cancels,
> but it does catch some poor forgeries. So... does some good, does no
> harm.
It prevents people from cancelling some of their own messages, if they
send the cancel from a different cluster machine. It's also in violation
of the current USEFOR draft, I believe.
--
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list