[2.3] lowmark

[Katsuhiro Kondou]

In article <8opmf9$3em$1 at krell.zikzak.de>,
	Bettina Fink <laura at hydrophil.de> wrote;

} But the active has an incorrect lowmark and overview data for
} the two cancelled articles is still around.

Maybe entreis for those articles are still left in history due
to /remember/.  This should be fixed so that token exists in
the entry.  I'll try.

} AIIIH! Where is this "1584" coming from?

That's in newsgroup database which includes hi/lo/flag for
the group.  I suspect there once was 1584 when database was
created.  That should be fixed together with above.
-- 
Katsuhiro Kondou