why are some articles not getting into history data base

[John Covici]

Well, I changed the overview method to buffindexed and it looks like
everything went into the history file properly and the overview file
is good too (I had to do a renumber).

I think this means that the ovdb method is not working properly for me
and I had problems with the tradindexed method as well.  Just thought
I'd let you guys know.  I would have preferred the ovdb method, but
...

John Covici <covici at ccs.covici.com> writes:

> Nope, nothing to indicate any problem at all, but I have done
> makehistory several times since the date of the article and it never
> gets included -- I could inject it manually, but then it would just
> make another copy, but I want it in the history database and in the
> overview so it can be deleted at the proper time.
> 
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Katsuhiro Kondou wrote:
> 
> >
> > In article <m3y9owi7om.fsf at ccs.covici.com>,
> > 	John Covici <covici at ccs.covici.com> wrote;
> >
> > } I am using the 07/03 stable release of inn and I have some articles in
> > } my spool which are not in the history file even after doing a
> > } makehistory -e -O.  I am using ovdb method on linux (version 3.2.9
> > } June 23) -- here is the article if that will help.
> > }
> > } Its way beyond the expiration for the group its in.
> >
> > It works on my note book with that article, and history
> > includes the entry(just examined).  I injected it into
> > timehash and tradindexed, however I don't think it
> > differs from other {storage|ov} method.  Can you find
> > any error messages in news.err?
> >
> 
> -- 
>          John Covici
>          covici at ccs.covici.com

-- 
         John Covici
         covici at ccs.covici.com