Assorted history questions

Alex Kiernan alexk at demon.net
Thu Feb 22 17:05:02 UTC 2001


Katsuhiro Kondou <kondou at nec.co.jp> writes:

> In article <72snl8qqpq.fsf at nd1.eng.demon.net>,
> 	Alex Kiernan <alexk at demon.net> wrote;
> 
> } How was `threshold' to HISexpire expected to work - I'm assuming upper
> } bound on the arrival time for articles passed to the callback; if you
> } tell expire to do decisions based on posting time you need to pass in
> } "infinite" (which I guess probably means 0 as a special case).
> 
> Looks good.
> 

I'm just going over what I've implemented and I think I've got it
wrong here... I can't imitate the deletion of the token when an
article has expired, but should still be remembered.

If I take the approach of threshold provides an upper bound on
remembered arrival times (so anything less than threshold doesn't go
through the callback & just gets deleted), and everything else then
returns `true' to keep, or `false' to discard (but remember) from the
callback, then I suspect I'm line with implementing what Russ
intended.

Does that make any kind of sense?

-- 
Alex Kiernan, Principal Engineer, Development, Thus PLC


More information about the inn-workers mailing list