Outstanding history items

[Marco d'Itri]

On Jul 16, Alex Kiernan <alexk at demon.net> wrote:

 >I wanted to always build a separate tagged hash implementation, but
 >I'd like it to be usable with large files enabled, unless there's good
 >technical reasons why not (which doesn't really appear to be the case
 >AFAICT).
And what about creating an binary history format?
I remember this had been talked about here last year, and it had some
interesting properties (the most important being a lot smaller).

-- 
ciao,
Marco