Correction: INN STABLE 20011014: Expire takes ages

Ron Jarrell jarrell at
Tue Nov 13 22:49:02 UTC 2001

At 02:01 PM 11/13/01 -0800, Joe St Sauver wrote:
>Unfortunately, it doesn't solve the whole expiration problem (at least 
>on large INN *reader* boxes) because if you run with CNFS plus tradindexed 
>overviews, expireover ends up doing touching too many articles trying to 
>see if they're still present in the CNFS spool... 
>I'd be interested in hearing what other folks are doing for large article
>count spool reader boxes in terms of overview solutions...

I'm running with ovdb, which means expireover only takes about 4 hours,
and expire is still blazingly fast, and just live with having to reboot the machine
about once a week, usually at 2 in the morning, when all of the db accessing 
processes deadlock.,,

More information about the inn-workers mailing list