[INN-COMMITTERS] STABLE-2_3 inn/innd (cc.c)

Russ Allbery rra at stanford.edu
Mon Aug 26 01:46:51 UTC 2002

Jeffrey M Vinocur <jeff at litech.org> writes:
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Russ Allbery wrote:

>> The reporting of readerswhenstopped by ctlinnd mode didn't make any
>> sense.  Inverted it, so that it now says "readers separate" if readers
>> are allowed when the server is throttled and "readers follow" if
>> readers are not allowed when the server is throttled.

> (If anybody has a script depending on that output, it will probably break
> horribly.  But I can't imagine what the point of such a script would be.)

Good point, though.  I was thinking documentation fix, but it would be
better not to put it into STABLE.  I'll go revert it there and just leave
it in CURRENT.

> I think "independent" would be better than "separate", at least.  

Thanks, committed.

> I guess "follow" isn't too bad, "linked" (or of course "dependent")
> would also work.

I've left this alone, at least for right now.

Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

    Please send questions to the list rather than mailing me directly.
     <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html> explains why.

More information about the inn-workers mailing list