[INN-COMMITTERS] STABLE-2_3 inn/innd (cc.c)
rra at stanford.edu
Mon Aug 26 01:46:51 UTC 2002
Jeffrey M Vinocur <jeff at litech.org> writes:
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> The reporting of readerswhenstopped by ctlinnd mode didn't make any
>> sense. Inverted it, so that it now says "readers separate" if readers
>> are allowed when the server is throttled and "readers follow" if
>> readers are not allowed when the server is throttled.
> (If anybody has a script depending on that output, it will probably break
> horribly. But I can't imagine what the point of such a script would be.)
Good point, though. I was thinking documentation fix, but it would be
better not to put it into STABLE. I'll go revert it there and just leave
it in CURRENT.
> I think "independent" would be better than "separate", at least.
> I guess "follow" isn't too bad, "linked" (or of course "dependent")
> would also work.
I've left this alone, at least for right now.
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Please send questions to the list rather than mailing me directly.
<http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html> explains why.
More information about the inn-workers