Controlchan in CURRENT
Jeffrey M. Vinocur
jeff at litech.org
Sun Feb 3 21:51:35 UTC 2002
On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Russ Allbery wrote:
> It's the other way around; controlchan is now the *only* way to do control
> messages. And what error messages are you getting?
I get
Feb 3 16:35:47 marduk innd: controlchan! spawned
controlchan!:14:proc:15641
Feb 3 16:35:47 marduk innd: controlchan! restarted
Feb 3 16:35:48 marduk innd: controlchan! exit 255 elapsed 0 pid 15641
Feb 3 16:35:48 marduk innd: controlchan!:14:proc:15641 closed
about five times a second. I commented out the controlchan part of
newsfeeds, and now it's not complaining -- is the controlchan now
implicit?
--
Jeffrey M. Vinocur
jeff at litech.org
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list