Controlchan in CURRENT
Russ Allbery
rra at stanford.edu
Sun Feb 3 22:00:33 UTC 2002
Jeffrey M Vinocur <jeff at litech.org> writes:
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> It's the other way around; controlchan is now the *only* way to do control
>> messages. And what error messages are you getting?
> I get
> Feb 3 16:35:47 marduk innd: controlchan! spawned
> controlchan!:14:proc:15641
> Feb 3 16:35:47 marduk innd: controlchan! restarted
> Feb 3 16:35:48 marduk innd: controlchan! exit 255 elapsed 0 pid 15641
> Feb 3 16:35:48 marduk innd: controlchan!:14:proc:15641 closed
> about five times a second. I commented out the controlchan part of
> newsfeeds, and now it's not complaining -- is the controlchan now
> implicit?
No... is there anything in errlog that may explain what's failing?
--
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list