Controlchan in CURRENT

Russ Allbery rra at stanford.edu
Sun Feb 3 22:00:33 UTC 2002


Jeffrey M Vinocur <jeff at litech.org> writes:
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Russ Allbery wrote:

>> It's the other way around; controlchan is now the *only* way to do control
>> messages.  And what error messages are you getting?

> I get

> Feb  3 16:35:47 marduk innd: controlchan! spawned
> controlchan!:14:proc:15641
> Feb  3 16:35:47 marduk innd: controlchan! restarted
> Feb  3 16:35:48 marduk innd: controlchan! exit 255 elapsed 0 pid 15641
> Feb  3 16:35:48 marduk innd: controlchan!:14:proc:15641 closed

> about five times a second.  I commented out the controlchan part of
> newsfeeds, and now it's not complaining -- is the controlchan now
> implicit?

No... is there anything in errlog that may explain what's failing?

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


More information about the inn-workers mailing list