"access: A" in STABLE

[Elizabeth Zaenger]

So which version of INN should we grab to make sure the code is in there and
working?

Liz

> From: Bettina Fink <laura at hydrophil.de>
> Date: 31 Jan 2002 14:14:32 GMT
> Organization: December Sadness
> User-Agent: tin/1.5.11-20020130 ("Toxicity") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.20 (i686))
> X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
> Sender: inn-workers-bounce at isc.org
> X-original-sender: laura at hydrophil.de
> Precedence: bulk
> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:inn-workers-request at isc.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
> List-ID: <inn-workers.isc.org>
> X-List-ID: <inn-workers.isc.org>
> 
> Bettina Fink <laura at hydrophil.de> wrote:
> 
> >>> AFAICS, it doesn't work.
> >>
> >> You are completely correct.  I must have confused `patch` when I was
> >> backporting from CURRENT; there's a line in the wrong place and as a
> >> result "access: A" would only work if a post: line was present.
> >> 
> >> I just fixed it, but I'll send you the patch directly as well in case
> >> you want it immediately.
> > 
> > Thanks, will go and test. :-)
> 
> Ok, checked the following scenarios:
> 
> access "local users" {
>         users: "<inx>, <home>, <localhost>"
>         newsgroups: "*"
>         access: RPA
>         localtime: true
> }
> 
> Posting with "Approved:" header:
> 
> Jan 31 14:57:01 wuff nnrpd[956]: absinth.snafu.net post ok <a3bifd$ts$1 at wuff.zikzak.de>
> 
> 
> access "local users" {
>         users: "<inx>, <home>, <localhost>"
>         newsgroups: "*"
>         access: RP
>         localtime: true
> }
> 
> Posting with "Approved:" header:
> 
> Jan 31 14:59:25 wuff nnrpd[968]: absinth.snafu.net post failed You are not allowed to approve postings
> 
> So at least for my constellation, everything seems to work fine, thanks!
> 
> Bye,
> Bettina
> 
>