new "access" parameter in readers.conf
br+inn at panix.com
Wed May 8 22:08:45 UTC 2002
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 06:02:13PM -0400, Jeffrey M. Vinocur wrote:
> On Wed, 8 May 2002, Ben Rosengart wrote:
> > I think our moderators can be trusted, so #2 is not so important,
> Well, if we had that, you could simply give everyone A access to the
> self-moderated groups.
True -- they are related questions.
> > but #1 is something I have to resolve before I can put INN 2.3.3
> > into production on reader machines.
> Why? The current functionality is a strict superset of what we had
> before. For the time being you can give everyone A access and get exactly
> the behavior you currently have, right?
Um. Right. I knew that, but I forgot it for long enough to write
It seems that every site that wants to support self-moderated groups
is going to have to use that strategy.
> What behavior do you envision for this situation?
I don't understand your question.
Ben Rosengart (212) 741-4400 x215
1. A robot may not injure entertainment industry profits, or, through inaction,
allow entertainment industry profits to come to harm. --Matt McLeod
More information about the inn-workers