2.3.5 w/db 4.1.25
Ron Jarrell
jarrell at solaris.cc.vt.edu
Thu Feb 20 10:00:36 UTC 2003
At 11:22 AM 2/17/03 +0000, Alex Kiernan wrote:
>Russ Allbery <rra at stanford.edu> writes:
>
>> Ron Jarrell <jarrell at solaris.cc.vt.edu> writes:
>> > At 04:10 PM 2/14/03 -0500, you wrote:
>>
>> >> Ok, so, I had my head stuck in the world of mail servers for a while,
>> >> and have been somewhat ignoring inn... Now I'm trying to catch up.
>> >> Running 20030213 current. Now, based on the news file, it looks like
>> >> it should be capable of
>>
>> > Actually, I meant stable, not current...
>>
>> I think the NEWS file in STABLE may be wrong, and 4.x means 4.0.
>
>Correct. -STABLE has changes so the code compiles, but not so it
>works.
>
>> Alex committed support for 4.1 to CURRENT; Alex, that didn't make it
>> into STABLE, did it?
>>
>
>It didn't - I'm still trying to find time to test the fix for that I
>put into -CURRENT :(
Ok, I'm kinda chasing my tail here... Is 4.1 supposed to work in -CURRENT?
I've tried upgrading my test server to current. Using ovdb_init -u failed miserably
(with db-4.1), so I killed everything, blew away my overview files, and figured I'd
use makehistory to rebuild it. Looks like I need to do a ovdb_init now before
running makehistory, because makehistory causes errors about ovdb_monitor.. So I
start ovdb_init, which creates a bunch of files, but does *not* create the ovnnnnn files.
I run makehistory, and makehistory now says that it cannot open overview, file exists.
But what's showing up in *syslog* is DB handle previously used in transaction,
missing transaction handle, and open: can't store numdbfiles: invalid argument...
So how in hell do you rebuild the db now, or is both current and stable just plain broken?
In other news, the doc/man/Makefile for CURRENT needs updating. Apparently sm
moved from .8 to .1, and got added to the section1 file list, but didn't get deleted from the
section 8 file list, which kills installs. This is as of 20030213.
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list