authentification domains/realms/whatever
Christoph Biedl
cbiedl at gmx.de
Tue Mar 8 00:20:06 UTC 2005
Jeffrey M.Vinocur wrote...
> In retrospect, that's
> probably a mistake given how reasonable your question is, but it can't
> be done as far as I can think of.
Well, I've seen such domain extensions of the user name for quite some
time now, not in nnrpd authentification however. But that would be a
nice-to-have in future versions.
> However, you've got three options:
>
> 1. If you can distinguish groups of users by incoming IP address
I cannot.
> 2. If there's no harm done to check some users against the wrong
> password databases, you can lump everything together in one auth block
> with multiple auth: parameters.
This could be a solution here although I don't like it as it's not
extensible.
> 3. You can use one auth block with a perl_auth: or python_auth:
> parameter to call out to a script capable of doing more powerful
> processing.
I was aware of that but I'd like to save work for writing that if
there's an easier solution available.
Thanks,
Christoph
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list