Some interesting stuff from PLD
Julien ÉLIE
julien at trigofacile.com
Tue May 6 13:18:43 UTC 2008
Hi Russ,
> Yes, increasing the client timeout is somewhat more reasonable, although I
> think there's also something in the RFC about that.
I only see timeout > 180 seconds (which is checked within innconf.c):
http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/nntp/rfcs/rfc3977.txt
An NNTP server MAY have an inactivity autologout timer. Such a timer
SHOULD be of at least three minutes' duration, with the exception
that there MAY be a shorter limit on how long the server is willing
to wait for the first command from the client.
Other inn.conf parameters which could be changed:
* hiscachesize is currently 0. Shouldn't it be set to 256? (or even more?)
Computers now have enough RAM...
* articlemmap is currently false whereas tradindexedmmap is true!
Shouldn't it be similarly set to true?
* nntpactsync -> maybe the name can be changed for INN 2.5.
"How many articles to process on an incoming channel before
logging the activity. The default value is 200.
FIXME: This is a rather unintuitive name for this parameter."
--
Julien ÉLIE
« César, c'est un Jules tout de même ! » (Astérix)
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list