INN 2.5, inn-CURRENT-20090103 Issues

[William Kronert]

Hi Julien,

At 03:46 AM 1/17/2009, Julien ÉLIE wrote:
>>It is great we are working out some of these bugs before the release of it
>
>Thanks for your reports too!

No problem and I am glad I can help in anyway.

>>It seems some of the checkgroup messages I see 
>>in miscctl.log look rather odd, not all of them but some of them.
>
>What is odd in them?
>Could you please give an example?

Okay, my miscctl.log has been clean out but I 
went back to all the checkgroups that have come 
out over the past 7 days and did a manual 
docheckgroups on all of them.  This past week 
includes: grisbi.*, fr.*, sdnet.*, fido7.*, ka.*, 
hr.*, big8, microsoft.public.*

I have not seen any problems or anything unusual 
with: grisbi.*, sdnet.*, ka.*, hr.*, big8, 
microsoft.public.* but have seen odd things with: fido7.* and fr.*.

In the case of fr.* it is completely is broken.
When I feed fr.* in manually into docheckgroups I get:
grep: Unmatched ) or \)
grep: Unmatched ) or \)
grep: Unmatched ) or \)
grep: Unmatched ) or \)
grep: Unmatched ) or \)
grep: Unmatched ) or \)

In the case of fido7.*:
         /etc/news/bin/ctlinnd newgroup fido7.ru.microchipòÁÚÒÁÂÏÔËÁ y
         /etc/news/bin/ctlinnd newgroup ÐÒÏÇÒÁÍÍÎÏ-ÁÐÐÁÒÁÔÎÙÈ y
         /etc/news/bin/ctlinnd newgroup ÓÒÅÄÓÔ× y
         /etc/news/bin/ctlinnd newgroup ÎÁ y

[a lot of lines like this. Our active file is in 
sync with ddt.demos.su (where fido7.* originates) 
since we get a feed from ddt.demos.su.]

I don't recall seeing this behavior (at least for fido7.*) in the old inn 2.4.2

Bill
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/inn-workers/attachments/20090117/ca042d2f/attachment.html>