bad_messageid

[Chris Knipe]

Hi,



Actually came to realize after I've hit sent, there's no point in hiding
the message-ids...  But oh well,



bad_messageid <part197of219.2VCPu4v4BzKrvM9AIwEW at Yenc@power-post.local>

bad_messageid <part203of219.9$2Z5eoUYMT&HHfk83tU at Yenc@power-post.local>

bad_messageid <part170of219.aztwXxLu3edYXTaQJTC2 at Yenc@power-post.local>

bad_messageid <part114of219.LlSblPRBqQMeV5gQnqkm at Yenc@power-post.local>

bad_messageid <part82of219.LlSblPRBqQMeV5gQnqkm at Yenc@power-post.local>

bad_messageid <part138of219.vA&O8bnz7R2cYJHFZUuS at Yenc@power-post.local>



Just a few (GMT+2) .  This is the latest version of INN (2.6.4 I believe)


Have rejected over 300K of these from one feed already out of some 380K
offers.





On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Chris Knipe <savage at savage.za.org> wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> Is there a way to disable these checks in incoming messages, or to relax
> it?
>
> I'm getting thousands of these, just as an example
>
>   bad_messageid <part1553of1353.kbi$KFf0LMR4$3&IW1wy at Yenc@domain.com>
>
> Whilst I understand that, technically yes, the message-id is bad (I
> receive mostly double @'s or double .'s), Diablo, and a lot of other usenet
> servers accept these messages.  They are freely available on all of usenet,
> not running INN it seems...
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> Chris Knipe
>



-- 

Regards,
Chris Knipe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/inn-workers/attachments/20160217/567dbf9b/attachment.html>