add "Auto-Submitted: auto-generated" to generated EMails?
Grant Taylor
gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net
Tue Mar 14 22:36:50 UTC 2023
On 3/14/23 3:50 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Yes, indeed. Although I do suspect that would result in better
> deliverability of moderated group submissions.
If we're tweaking how things are being sent, perhaps also explore some
ESMTP options like setting notify or what's returned (headers vs full
message).
> I guess... I'm not sure I really want to volunteer Todd and I for
> more work on that front, but at the same time it probably wouldn't
> be too much work.
>
> Some sort of centralized database like that is presumably the solution,
> though, whether at ISC or on GitHub or somewhere else like that.
> Not eyrie.org, though; there's too much Usenet stuff that depends on
> me personally already. :)
Is there a way to distribute this so that's it's not centralized? The
first thing that comes to mind is DNS.
> (Ideally we would publish the submission addresses of all moderated
> groups, but last time we asked the moderators were pretty strongly
> against that on the grounds that they'd get spammed. Which, well,
> is probably true; even though it's trivially possible to construct a
> working email address for every moderated group already, it doesn't
> get picked up by web scraping, so most spammers probably don't bother.)
:-/
> Yeah, that's a weird wrinkle, but also multiple moderated groups
> mostly just doesn't work and hasn't ever really worked. There's a
> protocol and everything for how to handle them, but my guess is that
> the number of people who follow that protocol are approximately zero.
:-(
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list