Rewriting IRRTools? [was: Re: [irrtoolset] Segmentation fault on peval]
tim.streater at dante.org.uk
Fri Nov 4 16:13:21 UTC 2005
At 15:50 04/11/2005, João Damas wrote:
>On 4 Nov, 2005, at 15:02, Simon Leinen wrote:
>> Marco d'Itri writes:
>>> (Instead of trying to debug this huge mess of C++ code I choose to
>>> rewrite in perl the parts I needed:
>> Over the years of problems with IRRToolSet, it had come to my mind
>> that this would probably be best - just rewrite the whole thing in
>> Perl. ISC, did you consider this route?
>We do not currently have resources for a full re-implementation by
>ISC itself, as no one is sponsoring this work. If there are people
>around who think this would be useful we can just act as a hosting
>place for the group to work and publish the work, much like we do for
>Other option is to go along with Marco, who is doing a good job.
Errr, now I am puzzled. I thought this package was handed over to ISC to support and enhance, to continue what RIPE had previously been doing. Is/was this not the case?
* * Tim Streater Network Engineer
* City House
* 126-130 Hills Road Tel +44 1223 371300
* Cambridge CB2 1PQ Fax +44 1223 371371
D A N T E United Kingdom WWW http://www.dante.net
More information about the irrtoolset