icmp 3/5 message makes the most sense

[Dave Taht]

but it really seems to me this needs to be an icmp6 message, originating from
2001:db8:0:1::1, going to the cpe  which is at (at the moment) :2 or :3

not an icmp4 message, which has no real internal destination

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> I really don't care what you use, if we use 13, it would be best to
> additionally filter it to only be from the local gw incoming address
> which would be... it's external interface
>
> nextly, messages sent to the log via iptables,
>
> are buffered for what appears to be about 30 seconds before appearing
> anywhere I can get at them.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
>> administratively prohibited is used by a lot of sysadmins for exactly
>> what it says.
>>
>> source routing nobody does anymore.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Francisco Obispo <fobispo at isc.org> wrote:
>>> I think it's important to state that the reason is administrative.. That's why we chose 13..
>>>
>>> Destination unreachable could be for several reasons including hardware failure :-(
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Mar 22, 2012, at 10:51 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICMP_Destination_Unreachable
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dave Täht
>>>> SKYPE: davetaht
>>>> US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
>>>> http://www.bufferbloat.net
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sdcpe-devel mailing list
>>>> sdcpe-devel at lists.isc.org
>>>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/sdcpe-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Täht
>> SKYPE: davetaht
>> US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
>> http://www.bufferbloat.net
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> SKYPE: davetaht
> US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
> http://www.bufferbloat.net



-- 
Dave Täht
SKYPE: davetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://www.bufferbloat.net