[stork-users] possible bug ?

DDFR | Ronald Blaas ronald.blaas at ddfr.nl
Fri Oct 13 06:38:08 UTC 2023


I do read in the documentation that output-options (with dash) is now the default...
Might have something to do with this..


________________________________
Van: Stork-users <stork-users-bounces at lists.isc.org> namens DDFR | Ronald Blaas <ronald.blaas at ddfr.nl>
Verzonden: vrijdag 13 oktober 2023 08:25
Aan: Marcin Siodelski <marcin at isc.org>; Stork-users <stork-users at lists.isc.org>
Onderwerp: Re: [stork-users] possible bug ?

Hi Marcin,

We are using kea 2.5.2 and using the original output_options (with underscore)

I shall ask this question on the kea user list as well.
Maybe there is some solution.

Thnx for replying 🙂

Regards

Ronald

________________________________
Van: Marcin Siodelski <marcin at isc.org>
Verzonden: donderdag 12 oktober 2023 21:39
Aan: DDFR | Ronald Blaas <ronald.blaas at ddfr.nl>; Stork-users <stork-users at lists.isc.org>
Onderwerp: Re: [stork-users] possible bug ?

Hi Ronald,

I don't recall any change in Stork between 1.12 and 1.13 that could
affect loggers. However, in Kea 2.5.1 there was a change in the Kea
configuration that added an alias output-options for the logger
parameter output_options. If your Kea configuration uses the
output-options (with a hyphen) Stork may not recognize it correctly. Can
you please check (and maybe share) your loggers configuration in Kea? If
you're using an older Kea version or/and you're not using the new alias
it must be something different.

I had a quick check and I see the loggers just fine in our Stork demo
setup. We're using Kea 2.4.0 and the legacy output_options (underscore)
for logger specification.

Marcin Siodelski
Sr. Software Engineer,
ISC

On 12.10.2023 21:08, DDFR | Ronald Blaas wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> With the new stork version (1.13) a new bug has come up.
>
> The stork server does not tell me the log location anymore.
>
> This is as well for DHCPv4 as for CA.
>
> Don't know if this is the way to report it.
>
> I found the log option there very handy. Would be a shame if it is gone.
>
> Maybe there is something I can adjust to get this back ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Ronald
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/stork-users/attachments/20231013/5bcf4e1b/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Stork-users mailing list