Problems With IXFR
Smith, William E. (Bill), Jr.
Bill.Smith at jhuapl.edu
Fri Oct 26 13:55:24 UTC 2001
Here's the response I get when doing the dig from a slave to the master.
Hope this will provide further info to assist.
Bill
; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> @128.244.197.22 SOA norecurse
; (1 server found)
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 6
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUERY SECTION:
;; norecurse, type = SOA, class = IN
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
. 1D IN SOA A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
nstld.verisign-grs.c
om. (
2001102600 ; serial
30M ; refresh
15M ; retry
1W ; expiry
1D ) ; minimum
;; Total query time: 29 msec
;; FROM: apldns1.jhuapl.edu to SERVER: 128.244.197.22
;; WHEN: Fri Oct 26 09:53:53 2001
;; MSG SIZE sent: 27 rcvd: 102
-----Original Message-----
From: Cricket Liu [mailto:cricket at menandmice.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:03 PM
To: Smith, William E. (Bill), Jr.; bind-users at isc.org
Subject: RE: Problems With IXFR
> I've been having some problems with IXFR. Things initially seemed to
> be going well since I was seeing IXFR merge success type messages and
> saw a .ixfr zone file for a couple zones. Shortly after I saw of few
> of the success messages, I began seeing messages similar to those
> below at which point it seems that ixfr stopped working. I'm trying
> to get a handle on what the problems are but having difficulty
> interpreting what is wrong from the errors. Any insight would be
> appreciated. Primary is running 8.2.4. Secondaries are 8.2.3. Aware
> of newer releases/updates on to do list.
What kind of a response do you get if you use dig to send a non-recursive
SOA query to the master from the slave?
cricket
Men & Mice
DNS Software & Services
www.menandmice.com
Attend our next DNS and BIND class! See
http://www.menandmice.com/8000/8000_dns_training.html
for the schedule and to register for upcoming classes
More information about the bind-users
mailing list