Has this bug been fixed since BIND 9.3.0?

[Mark Andrews]

> It seems that switching from allow-policy to allow-update is not done
> cleanly when you `rndc reconfig`.  I had a zone that used allow-policy to
> authenticate updates.  For testing, I removed the key from the config and
> changed the zone to an IP based allow-update and executed `rndc reconfig`.
> However, when doing updates on the zone using nsupdate, I get a refused
> response when attempting delete or add updates.  Sending queries with only
> prerequisites returned NXRRSET as expected.  So then I restarted the server
> and was able to do delete and add updates just fine.  I tried starting out
> with TSIG based allow-update and switching that to IP based allow-update and
> did a `rndc reconfig` and that worked intuitively.
> 
> Has this been fixed in BIND 9.3.1 or the BIND 9.3.2 beta?
> 
> Do you need more details to reproduce the problem?
> 
> Dave

	It will be fixed in the next (not this) release cycle.

 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Noc Phibee" <noc at phibee.net>
> To: <>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 3:28 AM
> Subject: Use bind with SSL ?
> 
> 
> > Hi
> >
> > i have installed Bind 9.X on Mandriva Linux, no problems, that work's
> > it's good.
> >
> > Now i want add 2 servers for secondary name server and i have two
> > questions :
> >
> > 1- The Zone transfert Master to Slave can use SSL for crypt the transfert
> ?
> >
> > 2- Can i said to slave server of automatiquely add a new zone when the
> > master
> > notifiy a new domains ?.
> > Actually, the master sent the notify and if i don't have add manually
> > into the /etc/named.conf
> > of the secondary, he reject it.
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews at isc.org