SPF implementation schedule.

almahmud at ranksitt.net almahmud at ranksitt.net
Tue Jul 12 09:07:14 UTC 2011


Hi,

I have fallen in problem with my  dns server. Some times , some specific
domain can't resolve. From log report (/var/log/messages) i have given log
for that.


Jul 12 11:17:44 ns1 named[14948]: client 178.33.222.134#38772: query
(cache) 'rankstel.net/MX/IN' denied
Jul 12 11:17:45 ns1 named[14948]: client 212.204.41.82#44529: query
(cache) 'rankstel.net/MX/IN' denied
Jul 12 11:17:48 ns1 named[14948]: client 212.204.41.82#64402: query
(cache) 'rankstel.net/MX/IN' denied
Jul 12 11:17:49 ns1 named[14948]: client 69.73.138.12#55591: query (cache)
'era.com.bd/MX/IN' denied

If you advise, its useful for me.

Regards-
Mahmud
almahmud at ranksitt.net













> On 2011-07-12 10:07, kalpesh varyani wrote:
>> Looking at zytrix and spf2 sites, it seems that SPF is yet to be
>> implemented at functional level. RFC4408 documentation suggests method
>> to implement SPF. However, I need to know if ISC is planning to provide
>> support for SPF at client and/or server side.
>> Will anyone from ISC like to comment?
>
> I'm not from ISC as well, but as Eivind has already stated - BIND
> already supports EVERYTHING there is on DNS server/resolver side. It
> serves SPF records, allows to fetch them, and there's nothing more from
> DNS you can require. What remains is *mailserver's* side to query for
> said SPF records and act accordingly. And this does not belong to ISC,
> but to your mailserver's provider. Postfix can do this by external
> plugins, some others probably as well but I haven't tested it.
> Regards,
>   Torinthiel
>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Eivind Olsen <eivind at aminor.no
>> <mailto:eivind at aminor.no>> wrote:
>>
>>     kalpesh varyani wrote:
>>
>>      > Does ISC implement SPF for server or client side currently?
>>      > If yes, then where to get the libraries; if not then what is the
>>      > scheduled date/release for implementation?
>>
>>     I'm not ISC, and anything I say may be completely wrong. Ok, that's
>> the
>>     disclaimer done with...
>>
>>     BIND support for SPF extends as far as being allowed to put SPF
>> records
>>     into zones. As far as I know BIND does not have any libraries or
>>     functions
>>     to actually make much sense of the content of SPF records, which is
>> what
>>     I'm guessing you're really looking for.
>>     Perhaps something like libspf (http://www.libspf2.org
>>     <http://www.libspf2.org/>) is what you want?
>>
>>     Regards
>>     Eivind Olsen
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
> unsubscribe from this list
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>





More information about the bind-users mailing list