ben.croswell at gmail.com
Tue Mar 13 14:02:32 UTC 2012
If you do not delegate the subdomains with NS records you are not fully
delegating the subdomain.
It will work fine in the short term, but are setting up a landmine for
someone to step on later.
If decide to move that subdomain to other dns servers later it will
disappear without the NS records.
The best practice is to always put the NS records and not leave it to
On Mar 13, 2012 9:43 AM, "hugo hugoo" <hugobxl at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback.
> Is this a glue record? I do not have any IP defined in the NS record.
> What is the flow of a request to a subzone?
> Is the content of the zone checked before checking the subzone?
> > Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:26:02 -0500
> > Subject: Re:
> > From: dan.mcdonald at austinenergy.com
> > To: hugobxl at hotmail.com; bind-users at lists.isc.org
> > On 3/13/12 8:20 AM, "hugo hugoo" <hugobxl at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > ==> do I have to create in zone "toto.be" the following NS record:
> > >
> > > titi.toto.be. TTL IN NS ns1.xxx.be
> > >
> > >
> > > I have found cases where this situation is present and other when it
> is not
> > > present...and both cases seems to work.
> > > What is the difference?
> > The glue records aren't necessary when both the zone and subzone are on
> > same server, although it is good to have them for completeness. When the
> > zones are on different servers you need the glue records.
> > --
> > Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
> unsubscribe from this list
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bind-users