Mailing list "reply-to" setting

Sten Carlsen stenc at
Thu May 9 22:43:14 UTC 2013

This is also the way I use mail, so +1.

On 09/05/13 23:02, Carlos M. martinez wrote:
> My mail setup is as limited as my eyesight. As I mentioned, I have
> emails in my inbox and filter afterwards in order to keep mbox size at
> reasonable levels. In this way I don't forget to check this or that folder.
> While on inbox I filter by looking at the tags. Works really well and I
> know quite a few people who do the same. I counted and I'm subscribed to
> over 50 mailing lists and this is the only one which does not tag the
> subject.
> Probably you've discussed this in the past (I'm a rather new
> subscriber), so I apologize for bringing up a dead horse.
> regards,
> Carlos
> On 5/8/13 10:53 PM, Michael McNally wrote:
>> On 5/8/13 9:43 AM, Carlos M. martinez wrote:
>>> Agreed, but, subject tagging is very useful for those who prefer to have
>>> things hit your inbox first, before archiving. And there seems to be a
>>> lot more agreement on the tagging issue than on the reply to.
>> Unless your mail setup is extremely restricted in what it can filter
>> on, you have several choices of header which can be used by an
>> automated filter to detect and classify appropriately according to list.
>> Personally I have procmail file bind-users traffic based on the
>> "List-Id:" header, but I realize you may be in a different environment
>> with different tools available.)
>>    List-Id: BIND Users Mailing List <>
>> Michael McNally
>> ISC Support
>> _______________________________________________
>> Please visit to
>> unsubscribe from this list
>> bind-users mailing list
>> bind-users at
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit to unsubscribe from this list
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at

Best regards

Sten Carlsen

No improvements come from shouting:

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the bind-users mailing list