Do we really need this mailing list?

[Michael Richardson]

Victoria Risk <vicky at isc.org> wrote:
    >> On Jan 21, 2022, at 12:05 PM, Paul Vixie <paul at redbarn.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> indeed. back in the day, i was a member of mh-users and mh-workers,
    >> and this inspired me to create bind-users and bind-workers. the point
    >> was outreach and engagement to people who would help design and
    >> implement the software.
    >>
    >> vicky, i am unsure where discussions take place in the gitlab. help?

    > This is exactly the kind of discussions that usually take place in
    > Gitlab. For example, if someone is proposing a change in the software,
    > that proposal is normally debated there, on a ticket, where the code in

Right, and unless I'm watching *all* discussion in gitlab, I won't see that
ticket.

    > There is no hidden desire here to stifle discussion - it is just that
    > with the proliferation of other channels, including Gitlab, the
    > DNS-OARC mattermost, dnsops and related mailing lists, having multiple
    > lists for public discussion of BIND seems unnecessary. At any rate, the
    > core team has trouble keeping up with all the lists, so we thought we
    > would consolidate.

If the list is so empty, how could it be contributing to being unable to keep
up?



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 398 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-workers/attachments/20220123/02116cd4/attachment.bin>