[bind10-dev] Use of -Werror in release tarballs
Michal 'vorner' Vaner
michal.vaner at nic.cz
Thu Feb 21 07:35:11 UTC 2013
Hello
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:45:30AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> +1 from me to include it. Asking a few other Debian folks about it,
> there doesn't seem to be any consensus on it one way or the other.
> Concerns were raised about newer gcc versions breaking the build, but
> the gcc in a given Debian stable release shouldn't ever be updated to
> start throwing new warnings. I tend to agree w/ the other point raised-
> if you don't know how to fix the warning or turn off -Werror, you
> probably shouldn't be trying to compile from source.
I'd like to disagree here. I know how to turn off -Werror. But if it so happened
I downloaded a tar ball, I might have done it because I'm looking for a software
that might solve some of my needs. If it fails to compile, I go and try an
alternative without further looking at what errors these are. I start reading
them only if there's no other alternative to try out.
With regards
--
This is a terroristic email. It will explode in 10 minutes,
if you do not close it in the meantime.
Michal 'vorner' Vaner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind10-dev/attachments/20130221/f8b1f18d/attachment.bin>
More information about the bind10-dev
mailing list