DHCP don't acknowledges more than 80 users??

[Joe in MPLS]

IIRC... failover peers split the address pools for each subnet with each 
peer getting half of the addresses. A peer won't claim the other half of 
the addresses until its partner is down long enough to be considered 
(more or less) permanently down. Do you have 160 addresses in that 
subnet's pool?

             ...jgm




Martin Hochreiter wrote:
> Austin Gabel schrieb:
>> failover peer "dhcp-failover" state {
>>   my state communications-interrupted at 2 2008/12/02 20:50:34;
>>   partner state normal at 1 2008/11/24 07:17:33;
>> }
>>
>> There is a hint right there.  Unless you just restarted your dhcp 
>> server, your failover peers are not communicating correctly.
>>
> Hi again,
>
> well there is no subnet declaration because it is ldap based -
> all that information is in the ldap tree ...
>
> The failover peer is down because we have to know if the
> dhcp server is able to work alone (to test the whole failover concept) -
> obviously it is not able to do so.
>
>
> lg
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users