ddns updates when using failover?

[John Miller]

<Light bulb goes off...>  Yes, 102.100 is a host declaration--I'd set a 
specific address to force an IP change.  Makes sense that both servers 
would offer out the static lease--they both know about it.

Thanks for the insight, Steve.

John



On 01/15/2014 11:51 AM, Steven Carr wrote:
> On 14 January 2014 22:04, John Miller <johnmill at brandeis.edu> wrote:
>> Thanks, Nicolas.  Glad to hear multiple updates isn't default behavior.
>> Here's the pertinent logs, as well as the DDNS-specific pieces of our DHCP
>> config.  Any help would be welcome!
>
> Is 129.64.102.100 part of a pool or is it a host declaration for
> a6:b2:b0:77:ed:ff? If it's a host declaration then both DHCP servers
> will attempt to update DNS as both DHCP servers will offer out the
> static lease to the client.
>
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>