Quick questions on 2.3...

[Katsuhiro Kondou]

In article <199910121317.JAA13184 at chaos.ao.net>,
	Dan Merillat <harik at chaos.ao.net> wrote;

} I've heard a lot about the development of buffindexed, but I havn't seen
} anything lately about the performance aspect.... how long does it take
} to xover control.cancel? (whats the range and how many articles are
} really there?)

Here is an article I posted a bit before to news.software.nntp:

From: Katsuhiro Kondou <kondou at uxd.fc.nec.co.jp>
Newsgroups: news.software.nntp
Subject: Re: inn 2.3 and overchan problems (repost)
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 13:59:33 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <7suqnl$ei4$1 at inn.do.mms.mt.nec.co.jp>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inn.do.mms.mt.nec.co.jp

In article <ylzoy52g8y.fsf at windlord.stanford.edu>,
	Russ Allbery <rra at stanford.edu> wrote;

} Faster writes, to make it easier for the server to keep up with a full
} feed.  tradindexed is optimized for readers, at the cost of being slow to
} write.

I believe reading performance is not so bad for buffindexed.

Sep 24 16:44:31 newstest nnrpd[24054]: reader overstats count 1 hit 147887 miss 116857 time 12849 size 33634907 dbz 0 seek 0 get 0 artcheck 851

This is the result of control.cancel.  10000 entries/sec.
The box is solaris2.5.1 on SS20 with 256MB memory.
-- 
Katsuhiro Kondou


} Oh yea, and why does Makefile think it's still 2.2?  I downloaded the
} snapshot and cvsup a few times before I realized what was going on. :)

That'll be fixed before it will be released.
-- 
Katsuhiro Kondou