The infamous to-do list
rra at stanford.edu
Sun Jun 25 06:59:10 UTC 2000
Richard Todd <rmtodd at ichotolot.servalan.com> writes:
> Um, AFAIK both tradindexed and buffindexed have no problem with being
> fed article data out of order; I don't know about ovdb.
Huh, I thought they did. I must have misunderstood something.
> I always understood that the primary problem with this was not that
> overview would get confused, but that readers on the slave server which
> connected at a time when article n+2 made it there, but not articles n
> and n+1, would assume that articles n and n+1 had been canceled and thus
> the readers would never show them even if you connected later after
> those articles made it to the slave server.
Changed to this explanation. Thanks.
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the inn-workers