Release status and plans

[Russ Allbery]

Forrest J Cavalier <mibsoft at epix.net> writes:

> Can we make it a release policy that anything that requires a rebuild of
> history or overview is a MAJOR release?

Sure, that sounds like a good idea.  I'm *hoping* that we can avoid
needing that much in the future, and in particular the history API should
*not* require a history rebuild.  We can provide our existing history
mechanisms under that API, after all.

> The INN 2.2 to 2.3 upgrade is a big gotcha.  Users don't expect that
> much pain for a minor release.  I think it should have been named INN
> 3.0, not 2.3.0.

Yeah, that's probably true.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>