cannot lock/unlock group at ...
Stas Pirogov
spam at keyos.org
Sun Jul 18 17:10:06 UTC 2004
Hi.
Yes, there is an NFS server involved.
Actually everything except binaries and
configuration is located on NetApp server.
The OS is Solaris 8 with latest patches.
I also noticed that there are additional
messages in error log that I never saw
before:
overchan: malformed token [B6E663D9736337B6E31C5780CE8423E9] alt.binaries.nl:2371315
innd: tradindexed: cannot lock group entry at 65608: Resource temporarily unavailable
innd: tradindexed: cannot unlock group entry at 65608: Resource temporarily unavailable
overchan: malformed token [BA538122EC1A8EDFEE36673F618415B3] control.cancel:14820351
innd: tradindexed: cannot lock group entry at 2392520: Resource temporarily unavailable
innd: tradindexed: cannot unlock group entry at 2392520: Resource temporarily unavailable
It seems that both errors are somehow related, because I
have lock/unlock attempt error for every malformed token.
Sorry that I didn't mentioned that in the first message.
Anything we can do to fix the problem ?
Stas.
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 09:10:23 -0700
> From: Russ Allbery <rra at stanford.edu>
> To: inn-workers at isc.org
> Subject: Re: cannot lock/unlock group at ...
>
> spam <spam at keyos.org> writes:
>
> > Today after upgrading from INN 2.3.3 to INN 2.4.1 using regular 'make
> > update' I started seeing following error message in general log:
>
> > innd: [ID 801587 local0.error] tradindexed: cannot lock group entry at 2008648: Resource temporarily unavailable
> > innd: [ID 801587 local0.error] tradindexed: cannot lock group entry at 2008648: Resource temporarily unavailable
> > innd: [ID 801587 local0.error] tradindexed: cannot unlock group entry at 2008648: Resource temporarily unavailable
> > innd: [ID 801587 local0.error] tradindexed: cannot unlock group entry at 2008648: Resource temporarily unavailable
>
> > Huge amount of such messages coming in bulks (around 100 messages at
> > once and then pause for a minute or two). The numbers of group entry
> > position in the message change constantly.
>
> > New binaries were compiled with exact same options as old ones and
> > configuration was checked and compared to generated samples.
>
> > I don't see any impact on service, but I would like to understand why
> > there's a problem with locking and to fix it.
>
> Yeah, INN continues on if it can't get a lock.
>
> For some reason, your operating system is occasionally rejecting attempts
> to do advisory locking on the group index file with EAGAIN. I'm not sure
> why. It should block the operation until the lock can be acquired, if
> it's currently held by another process.
>
> What operating system is this? And is there NFS involved?
>
> (INN 2.3.3 wasn't as comprehensive about its locking, so I'm not too
> surprised that this changed between versions.)
>
> --
> Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
>
> Please send questions to the list rather than mailing me directly.
> <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html> explains why.
>
>
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list