2.4.2 issue still (ctlinnd and "message too long")
rra at stanford.edu
Mon Jul 11 15:16:52 UTC 2005
Chris Caputo <ccaputo at alt.net> writes:
> On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> All of them handled 8KB packet sizes without any trouble except for
>> Tru64 and FreeBSD, which can't handle a byte over 2KB. So I'm afraid
>> that INN is running into (stupidly low) OS-imposed limits that there's
>> no way around without major surgery in how ctlinnd talks to innd, and
>> doing the latter isn't something on my list to work on.
Apparently, you can change this with setsockopt. So I have hope again
that this might be fixed in the next stable release.
> Out of curiosity, why would ctlinnd messages ever need to be longer than
ctlinnd name '', mostly.
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Please send questions to the list rather than mailing me directly.
<http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html> explains why.
More information about the inn-workers