Development releases for ISC
rra at stanford.edu
Sun Nov 16 22:56:23 UTC 2008
Julien ÉLIE <julien at trigofacile.com> writes:
> I believe people are more inclined to test real development releases
> (identified by a release number) than nightly snapshots (which are
> perhaps supposed unstable...). But I might be wrong.
You're probably right.
> According to ISC version numbering, it would be INN 2.5.0b1 for the first
> beta release.
> I suggest to add an optional variable to "support/mksnapshot":
> ./mksnapshot b1
> would generate inn-2.5.0b1 with a README.beta file.
Sure, that sounds excellent.
> Do you agree to generate inn-2.5.0b1 with the following process?
Go for it. I don't think there's a tremendous reason to delay 2.5.0
further. There's always more stuff to be done, but it's a fairly
substantial improvement over 2.4 already.
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Please send questions to the list rather than mailing me directly.
<http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html> explains why.
More information about the inn-workers