inn 2.5.1 in freebsd jail with buffindexed
rjmlist at xs4all.nl
rjmlist at xs4all.nl
Sun Nov 29 14:53:51 UTC 2009
Hi,
> I used the db47 port instead, and compiled INN from source.
while troubleshooting I eventually did the same
> Julien already mentioned that you compiled your INN with ovdb support
> which doesn't make sense if you plan to use buffindexed instead.
Yeah, fixed that. I'm still not sure what exactly happened with that file
but I corrected it.
> If you opt for ovdb instead of buffindexed then I would highly
> recommend for adding "--with-zlib" (new compression mode for ovdb).
I'll look into that. Can I switch that on without the need to start from
scratch with empty ovdb files ?
> I use ...
> | ezjail_procfs_enable="NO"
> | ezjail_fdescfs_enable="NO"
> ... instead. I do not need those two options in all my jails.
I switched those on just to be sure not to miss any functionality
regarding my issue. The shmem error is related to the sysV system, I
wasn't aware of that yesterday. So I struggled around the system looking
for clues and switching on things in the hope that would help heh.
> Shot in the dark: FBSD 8.0 is out some days now. There's a lot of
> improvements regarding jails. But I'm not sure if this involves shared
> memory as well, actually I doubt.
Well, Julien's suggestion about SystemV shared memory made me to alter
security.jail.sysvipc_allowed to 1. That proved to be succesfull and
accordingly I mailed him (offlist, by accident).
I'm not aware of systemV changes in 8.0 as well. I plan to migrate the
first box over to 8.0 next month.
After verifying all was well (well, some minor cmsg and nocem issues are
left now, seems the syntax of config files has been changed and I naively
copied over just the old pre 2.5.x files), I tried inn-STABLE-20091128.
That went okay, no issues or bad_command's to report; although 2 feeds,
both <32k, !binary, not a very demanding environment.
Thank you for your reply.
Kind regards,
Robert
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list