Division by zero in innreport
julien at trigofacile.com
Sat Jan 7 10:31:28 UTC 2012
Hi John and Alexander,
Thanks for the good news!
> news at n102:/usr/lib/news/bin$ patch -b --verbose innreport innreport_patch
> Hunk #9 succeeded at 743 (offset 5 lines).
> Hunk #10 succeeded at 1119 (offset 6 lines).
Yep, that's fine. The version of innreport shipped with INN 2.5.2 has a
few lines more than the STABLE and CURRENT versions of INN against which
I made the patch. No problem (assignment to the deprecated "$["
variable for the index of the first element of an array has been removed
in innreport shipped with 2.5.3 and later).
> Evidentially the 2.4.3 code does not suffer from this bug. They are
> all working fine, and haven't had any error messages in the Daily
That's right. Nonetheless, the 2.4.3 code suffers from several other
bugs that have been fixed in later versions, especially thanks to Alexander.
> As for your thoughts of additional time to run, I see no difference
> between the time the e-mail was sent at 00:22 and previous days.
Time::Local::localtime() is then probably well optimized; good news too.
« Les ouvriers qui font la pause lentilles voient arriver un visiteur
inattendu… » (Astérix)
More information about the inn-workers